Usik sedikit: Baca kedua-dua artikel dibawah seolah-olah menunjukkan bahawa DAP sudah menggunakan tektik PAP di singapura? Adakah DAP sudah mula belajar dari kejayaan PAP dalam men "senyap"kan lawan mereka di singapura? Kalau disingapura lawan kerajaan disana akan dimufliskan melalui tindakan saman di Mahkamah. Adakah ini akan menjadi taktik terbaru DAP? Dalam untuk melemahkan utusan Malaysia yang selama ini menjadi suara orang melayu, DAP sudah mula mengorak langkah memufliskan utusan? Lihat sahaja tindakan karpal singh dan teressa. Mungkin selepas ini walaupun utusan menang saman ini, utusan akan tidak lagi menjadi begitu vocal dalam memperjuangkan agenda melayu? Hanya waktu yang akan menentukannya. www.rencahmalaysia.blogspot.com dipetik dari:www.thestar.com.my Friday September 19, 2008 MYT 5:33:02 PM Teresa Kok released from ISA detention (Update 6) KUALA LUMPUR: Seputeh MP Teresa Kok was released from detention under the Internal Security Act at about 1pm on Friday. Her father Kok Kim Tong and mother Poh Seh Kwon were at the Jalan Travers police station here when she was released. "I am happy that I have been released and I'm okay," she told reporters gathered at the police station. "I do not know why I was released today, just as I do not know why I was detained," she added. Deputy Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Ismail Omar said that Kok had been released at 1.30pm after investigations showed there was no reason to detain her any further. "She has released unconditionally," he added. Kok, 44, later Friday told a press conference at the DAP headquarters in Petaling Jaya that she would sue Utusan Malaysia and its columnist Zaini Hassan over articles written about her. She also said she would sue former Selangor Mentri Besar Datuk Seri Dr Mohd Khir Toyo over his statements about her, and the Government for unlawful detention (see full statement below). Kok said that throughout her detention, she was repeatedly asked three questions: 1) Whether she had mobilised a group of residents at Bandar Kinrara to present a petition to oppose the Azan at the Bandar Kinrara mosque; 2) Whether she had made a statement that 30% of the allocation for the Selangor Religious Department should be given to other non-religious bodies; and 3) Whether she was opposed to Jawi wordings in road signages in Kuala Lumpur. Kok also said that the police never explained to her why she had been detained. "I kept asking why I had been detained but the police never told me why," she added, saying that she gave her full co-operation to the police during her eight-day detention. Selangor Mentri Besar Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim and DAP leaders showed up in full force for the press confenrence. The Kinrara assemblyman and senior Selangor state executive councillor was detained one week ago, together with Malaysia Today editor Raja Petra Kamarudin and Sin Chew Daily reporter Tan Hoon Cheng. Tan was released after 18 hours. Kok was detained because she was considered a potential threat to national security for "racial incitement" after she was accused of petitioning a mosque to reduce the volume for azan (the call to prayer), something which she had vehemently denied. The accusation surfaced in a Sept 10 article in Utusan Malaysia quoting former Selangor Mentri Besar Datuk Seri Dr Mohd Khir Toyo. The accusation was refuted by the Kinrara mosque committee chairman and Kota Raja MP Dr Siti Mariah had lodged a police report against Dr Mohd Khir on this issue. Kok also lodged a police report against the Malay daily, its columnist Zaini Hassan and Dr Mohd Khir. "I believe one of the excuses for my ISA detention is in relation to that article and I place Utusan Malaysia, Zaini Hassan and Dr Mohd Khir Toyo responsible for my arrest," she had stated in her police report. On Monday, Kok filed a habeas corpus application in the High Court for her release citing that her arrest and detention under the Internal Security Act was unlawful. Sankara said then that the court had fixed Sept 23 for hearing but said they would apply for Sept 22 instead as he had another case and Karpal Singh would be in East Malaysia on that date. Karpal sues Utusan for RM10m KUALA LUMPUR: Bukit Gelugor Member of Parliament Karpal Singh has filed an RM10mil suit against Utusan Melayu (M) Sdn Bhd over a defamatory article in its Malay daily Utusan Malaysia regarding his purported comments on Islam. The writ of summons was filed at the Civil High Court registry in the Jalan Duta Court Complex today through his law firm, Karpal Singh & Co. In his statement of claim, Karpal, who is also a lawyer, claimed the article entitled DAP diingat jangan bakar perasaan Melayu (DAP reminded not to inflame sentiments of Malays) published on Aug 25, had stated that he made the comments on Islam in his welcoming speech at the 15th DAP National Congress held on the previous day. He claimed the defamatory words were understood to mean, among others, that Karpal was a politician bent on creating ill-will among the different communities in the country, was absolutely false and malicious and were intended to destroy his professional and political careers. The DAP national chairman said he had consistently maintained in his public speeches and during his membership of Parliament in the Dewan Rakyat for the last 26 years that Islam was the official religion of the country as provided under Article 3 (1) of the Federal Constitution. Karpal said he gave notice to Utusan for retraction and apology without prejudice to his right to commence legal proceedings against the Bahasa Malaysia daily newspaper. He stated that it would be in Utusan's best interests to comply with his demand for mitigation purposes on damages which could ultimately be ordered against the newspaper by the court. He said Utusan complied with his demand and had published an article entitled Ralat on Aug 26, retracting and giving its unconditional apology to him and accepted that the words complained of, had no basis. Karpal noted that the publication of the defamatory words by Utusan on the eve of the polling day of the Permatang Pauh by-election parliamentary seat was to defame him in his capacity as a Pakatan Rakyat coalition leader, with a view to ensure that de facto Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) adviser Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim lost in the by-election. He sought RM10mil in general damages, aggravated damages, exemplary damages, interest, costs and any relief deemed proper by the court. -- Bernama
Sep 19, 2008
Polemik permainan PAP di singapura mula diguna oleh DAP di Malaysia?: senyapkan nadi melayu, mufliskan Utusan
amirrash Sep 19, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (RSS)
0 Responses:
Post a Comment